Tournaments / 2013-2014
Wells Fargo Championship
2014-05-01 · Quail Hollow Club
- Winner
- J.B. Holmes
- Winning score
- -14
- Field
- 150
- Field strength
- +0.067 SG
The 2013-2014 Wells Fargo Championship was played at Quail Hollow Club, starting 1 May 2014. J.B. Holmes won at 14 under par (274), 1 stroke ahead of Jim Furyk. The winning card was 70, 67, 66 and 71, and the win paid $1,242,000. Jim Furyk finished second, and Martin Flores was third. 150 players started the event. The field averaged +0.067 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 87% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 150. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- J.B. Holmes
- Pos
- 1
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 274
- Jim Furyk
- Pos
- 2
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 275
- Martin Flores
- Pos
- 3
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 276
- Jason Bohn
- Pos
- 4
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 277
- Justin Rose
- Pos
- 5
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 278
- Brendon de Jonge
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 80
- R2
- 62
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 279
- Kevin Kisner
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 279
- Roberto Castro
- Pos
- T8
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 280
- Rory McIlroy
- Pos
- T8
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 76
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 280
- Rory Sabbatini
- Pos
- T8
- R1
- 74
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 280
- Kevin Chappell
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 281
- Michael Thompson
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 281
- Phil Mickelson
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 75
- R3
- 63
- R4
- 76
- Total
- 281
- Geoff Ogilvy
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 282
- Jonathan Byrd
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 282
- Kevin Streelman
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 282
- Zach Johnson
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 282
- Charles Howell III
- Pos
- T18
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 283
- Gary Woodland
- Pos
- T18
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 283
- Kevin Na
- Pos
- T18
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 283
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 73 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.434
- Top-20 hit rate
- 50%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 24.7
Grade is this event’s percentile (82nd) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Rory McIlroy | 1st | 8th |
| Justin Rose | 2nd | 5th |
| Jim Furyk | 3rd | 2nd |
| Phil Mickelson | 4th | 11th |
| Webb Simpson | 5th | 38th |
| Ryan Moore | 6th | 18th |
| Zach Johnson | 7th | 14th |
| Bill Haas | 8th | 44th |
| Chris Kirk | 9th | 30th |
| Hunter Mahan | 10th | 50th |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Kisner | 60th | 6th(−54) |
| Mark Wilson | 66th | 23rd(−43) |
| Jason Bohn | 46th | 4th(−42) |
| Geoff Ogilvy | 55th | 14th(−41) |
| Y.E. Yang | 64th | 23rd(−41) |
| Hunter Mahan | 10th | 50th(+40) |
| Michael Thompson | 49th | 11th(−38) |
| Derek Ernst | 68th | 30th(−38) |
| Cameron Tringale | 23rd | 60th(+37) |
| Brian Harman | 28th | 65th(+37) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at Quail Hollow Club in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the Wells Fargo Championship in 2013-2014?
Where was the 2013-2014 Wells Fargo Championship played?
What was the winning score at the 2013-2014 Wells Fargo Championship?
How many players were in the Wells Fargo Championship field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.