Tournaments / 2019-2020
AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
2020-02-06 · Pebble Beach Golf Links
- Winner
- Nick Taylor
- Winning score
- -19
- Field
- 155
- Field strength
- -0.122 SG
The 2019-2020 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am was played at Pebble Beach Golf Links, starting 6 February 2020. Nick Taylor won at 19 under par (268), 4 strokes ahead of Kevin Streelman. The winning card was 63, 66, 69 and 70, and the win paid $1,404,000. Kevin Streelman finished second, and Phil Mickelson was third. 155 players started the event. The field averaged -0.122 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 77% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 155. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- Nick Taylor
- Pos
- 1
- R1
- 63
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 268
- Kevin Streelman
- Pos
- 2
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 272
- Phil Mickelson
- Pos
- 3
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 64
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 74
- Total
- 273
- Jason Day
- Pos
- 4
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 64
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 75
- Total
- 276
- Charl Schwartzel
- Pos
- T5
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 73
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 278
- Daniel Berger
- Pos
- T5
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 278
- Matt Jones
- Pos
- T5
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 73
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 278
- Maverick McNealy
- Pos
- T5
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 278
- Jordan Spieth
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 279
- Lanto Griffin
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 279
- Matt NeSmith
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 280
- Patrick Cantlay
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 72
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 280
- Peter Malnati
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 75
- Total
- 280
- J.B. Holmes
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 281
- Joel Dahmen
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 73
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 281
- Kevin Na
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 75
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 281
- Max Homa
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 74
- Total
- 281
- Chesson Hadley
- Pos
- T18
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 72
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 282
- Harry Higgs
- Pos
- T18
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 74
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 282
- Joseph Bramlett
- Pos
- T18
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 282
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 68 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.245
- Top-20 hit rate
- 50%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 23.2
Grade is this event’s percentile (27th) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Casey | 1st | 64th |
| Patrick Cantlay | 2nd | 11th |
| Matt Kuchar | 3rd | 38th |
| Lucas Glover | 4th | 50th |
| Dustin Johnson | 5th | 32nd |
| Jason Day | 6th | 4th |
| Daniel Berger | 7th | 5th |
| Matt Fitzpatrick | 8th | 60th |
| Viktor Hovland | 9th | 38th |
| Kevin Kisner | 10th | 38th |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Casey | 1st | 64th(+63) |
| Charl Schwartzel | 64th | 5th(−59) |
| Matt Fitzpatrick | 8th | 60th(+52) |
| Aaron Wise | 15th | 62nd(+47) |
| Joseph Bramlett | 65th | 18th(−47) |
| Lucas Glover | 4th | 50th(+46) |
| Cameron Tringale | 21st | 64th(+43) |
| Matt Kuchar | 3rd | 38th(+35) |
| Kurt Kitayama | 53rd | 18th(−35) |
| Zac Blair | 52nd | 18th(−34) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at Pebble Beach Golf Links in Pebble Beach, California, USA. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am in 2019-2020?
Where was the 2019-2020 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am played?
What was the winning score at the 2019-2020 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am?
How many players were in the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.