Tournaments / 2026
3M Open
2026-07-23 · TPC Twin Cities
- Winner
- Jackson Koivun
- Winning score
- -25
- Field
- 137
- Field strength
- -0.072 SG
The 2026 3M Open was played at TPC Twin Cities, starting 23 July 2026. Jackson Koivun won at 25 under par (259), 3 strokes ahead of Scottie Scheffler. The winning card was 64, 68, 61 and 66, and the win paid $1,584,000. Scottie Scheffler finished second. 137 players started the event. The field averaged -0.072 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 78% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 137. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- Jackson Koivun
- Pos
- 1
- R1
- 64
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 61
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 259
- Scottie Scheffler
- Pos
- 2
- R1
- 65
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 63
- Total
- 262
- Brian Harman
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 64
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 264
- Chandler Phillips
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 264
- Denny McCarthy
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 264
- Hideki Matsuyama
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 64
- Total
- 264
- Davis Thompson
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 63
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 265
- Emiliano Grillo
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 64
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 265
- Ben Kohles
- Pos
- 9
- R1
- 62
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 266
- Gary Woodland
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 64
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 267
- Michael Kim
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 59
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 267
- Seamus Power
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 63
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 267
- Billy Horschel
- Pos
- T13
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 268
- Jake Knapp
- Pos
- T13
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 62
- Total
- 268
- Zac Blair
- Pos
- T13
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 268
- Davis Chatfield
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 269
- Kevin Yu
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 269
- Patrick Fishburn
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 269
- Zecheng Dou
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 269
- Christiaan Bezuidenhout
- Pos
- T20
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 270
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 65 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.403
- Top-20 hit rate
- 50%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 16.6
Grade is this event’s percentile (73rd) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Scottie Scheffler | 1st | 2nd |
| Hideki Matsuyama | 2nd | 3rd |
| Kurt Kitayama | 3rd | 24th |
| Maverick McNealy | 4th | 34th |
| Jake Knapp | 5th | 13th |
| Corey Conners | 6th | 39th |
| Keith Mitchell | 7th | 44th |
| Christiaan Bezuidenhout | 8th | 20th |
| Gary Woodland | 9th | 10th |
| Tom Kim | 10th | 20th |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Sam Stevens | 13th | 60th(+47) |
| Chandler Phillips | 47th | 3rd(−44) |
| Chandler Blanchet | 64th | 24th(−40) |
| Davis Chatfield | 55th | 16th(−39) |
| Keith Mitchell | 7th | 44th(+37) |
| A.J. Ewart | 18th | 55th(+37) |
| Hank Lebioda | 60th | 24th(−36) |
| Rico Hoey | 28th | 62nd(+34) |
| Corey Conners | 6th | 39th(+33) |
| Maverick McNealy | 4th | 34th(+30) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at TPC Twin Cities in Blaine, Minnesota, USA. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the 3M Open in 2026?
Where was the 2026 3M Open played?
What was the winning score at the 2026 3M Open?
How many players were in the 3M Open field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.