Tournaments / 2025
3M Open
2025-07-24 · TPC Twin Cities
- Winner
- Kurt Kitayama
- Winning score
- -23
- Field
- 149
- Field strength
- -0.046 SG
The 2025 3M Open was played at TPC Twin Cities, starting 24 July 2025. Kurt Kitayama won at 23 under par (261), 1 stroke ahead of Sam Stevens. The winning card was 65, 71, 60 and 65, and the win paid $1,512,000. Sam Stevens finished second. 149 players started the event. The field averaged -0.046 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 87% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 149. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- Kurt Kitayama
- Pos
- 1
- R1
- 65
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 60
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 261
- Sam Stevens
- Pos
- 2
- R1
- 62
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 262
- David Lipsky
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 64
- Total
- 264
- Jake Knapp
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 64
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 264
- Matt Wallace
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 65
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 64
- Total
- 264
- Pierceson Coody
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 65
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 264
- Alex Noren
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 62
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 265
- Takumi Kanaya
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 64
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 265
- William Mouw
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 265
- Chris Gotterup
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 63
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 266
- Noah Goodwin
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 266
- Taylor Montgomery
- Pos
- T12
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 63
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 267
- Wyndham Clark
- Pos
- T12
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 267
- Adam Svensson
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 60
- R2
- 75
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 268
- Chris Kirk
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 64
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 268
- Jesper Svensson
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 63
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 268
- Mac Meissner
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 268
- Taylor Moore
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 268
- Thorbjørn Olesen
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 62
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 268
- Ben Kohles
- Pos
- T20
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 269
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 76 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.152
- Top-20 hit rate
- 35%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 30.2
Grade is this event’s percentile (8th) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Sam Burns | 1st | 61st |
| Kurt Kitayama | 2nd | 1st |
| Taylor Pendrith | 3rd | 68th |
| Akshay Bhatia | 4th | 25th |
| Wyndham Clark | 5th | 12th |
| Adam Scott | 6th | 53rd |
| Christiaan Bezuidenhout | 7th | 20th |
| Alex Noren | 8th | 7th |
| Sam Stevens | 9th | 2nd |
| Victor Perez | 10th | 28th |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Taylor Pendrith | 3rd | 68th(+65) |
| David Lipsky | 67th | 3rd(−64) |
| Sam Burns | 1st | 61st(+60) |
| Noah Goodwin | 68th | 10th(−58) |
| Pierceson Coody | 57th | 3rd(−54) |
| Taylor Montgomery | 65th | 12th(−53) |
| William Mouw | 58th | 7th(−51) |
| Kevin Kisner | 76th | 28th(−48) |
| Adam Scott | 6th | 53rd(+47) |
| Harry Higgs | 70th | 25th(−45) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at TPC Twin Cities in Blaine, Minnesota, USA. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the 3M Open in 2025?
Where was the 2025 3M Open played?
What was the winning score at the 2025 3M Open?
How many players were in the 3M Open field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.