Tournaments / 2024
World Wide Technology Championship
2024-11-07 · El Cardonal at Diamante
- Winner
- Austin Eckroat
- Winning score
- -24
- Field
- 114
- Field strength
- -0.178 SG
The 2024 World Wide Technology Championship was played at El Cardonal at Diamante, starting 7 November 2024. Austin Eckroat won at 24 under par (264), 1 stroke ahead of Carson Young. The winning card was 68, 67, 66 and 63, and the win paid $1,296,000. Carson Young and Justin Lower tied for second. 114 players started the event. The field averaged -0.178 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 82% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 114. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- Austin Eckroat
- Pos
- 1
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 63
- Total
- 264
- Carson Young
- Pos
- T2
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 61
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 265
- Justin Lower
- Pos
- T2
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 63
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 265
- Max Greyserman
- Pos
- 4
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 64
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 266
- Joe Highsmith
- Pos
- 5
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 269
- David Lipsky
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 271
- Garrick Higgo
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 64
- Total
- 271
- Maverick McNealy
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 271
- Nico Echavarria
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 63
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 271
- Sam Stevens
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 271
- Wesley Bryan
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 271
- Kevin Chappell
- Pos
- T12
- R1
- 75
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 272
- Patrick Fishburn
- Pos
- T12
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 272
- Dylan Wu
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 72
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 273
- Harris English
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 273
- Harry Hall
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 273
- Jacob Bridgeman
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 273
- Joel Dahmen
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 273
- Ryan Gerard
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 273
- Beau Hossler
- Pos
- T20
- R1
- 76
- R2
- 63
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 274
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 67 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.337
- Top-20 hit rate
- 45%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 25.3
Grade is this event’s percentile (56th) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Lucas Glover | 1st | 24th |
| Doug Ghim | 2nd | 20th |
| Beau Hossler | 3rd | 20th |
| Matt Kuchar | 4th | 30th |
| J.J. Spaun | 5th | 30th |
| Tom Hoge | 6th | 45th |
| Ben Griffin | 7th | 24th |
| Harris English | 8th | 14th |
| Max Greyserman | 9th | 4th |
| Adam Svensson | 10th | 39th |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Garrick Higgo | 59th | 6th(−53) |
| Erik van Rooyen | 15th | 64th(+49) |
| Kevin Chappell | 56th | 12th(−44) |
| Ryan Gerard | 57th | 14th(−43) |
| Wesley Bryan | 46th | 6th(−40) |
| David Lipsky | 46th | 6th(−40) |
| Ryan McCormick | 64th | 24th(−40) |
| Tom Hoge | 6th | 45th(+39) |
| Nate Lashley | 21st | 55th(+34) |
| Nico Echavarria | 40th | 6th(−34) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at El Cardonal at Diamante in Los Cabos, MEX. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the World Wide Technology Championship in 2024?
Where was the 2024 World Wide Technology Championship played?
What was the winning score at the 2024 World Wide Technology Championship?
How many players were in the World Wide Technology Championship field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.