Tournaments / 2019-2020
Waste Management Phoenix Open
2020-01-30 · TPC Scottsdale (Stadium Course)
- Winner
- Webb Simpson
- Winning score
- -17
- Field
- 131
- Field strength
- +0.16 SG
The 2019-2020 Waste Management Phoenix Open was played at TPC Scottsdale (Stadium Course), starting 30 January 2020. Webb Simpson won at 17 under par (267). The winning card was 71, 63, 64 and 69, and the win paid $1,314,000. Tony Finau finished second, and Bubba Watson, Justin Thomas and Nate Lashley tied for third. 131 players started the event. The field averaged +0.16 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 85% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 131. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- Webb Simpson
- Pos
- P1
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 63
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 267
- Tony Finau
- Pos
- P2
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 62
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 267
- Bubba Watson
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 270
- Justin Thomas
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 270
- Nate Lashley
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 270
- Max Homa
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 271
- Scott Piercy
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 271
- Adam Long
- Pos
- 8
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 272
- Billy Horschel
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 63
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 73
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 273
- Branden Grace
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 273
- Byeong Hun An
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 65
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 273
- Daniel Berger
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 273
- Hudson Swafford
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 74
- Total
- 273
- Jon Rahm
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 273
- Mark Hubbard
- Pos
- T9
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 64
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 273
- Brandon Hagy
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 274
- Harris English
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 65
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 274
- Hideki Matsuyama
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 74
- R3
- 65
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 274
- J.B. Holmes
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 64
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 75
- Total
- 274
- Keith Mitchell
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 274
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 66 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.228
- Top-20 hit rate
- 55%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 20.6
Grade is this event’s percentile (23rd) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Justin Thomas | 1st | 3rd |
| Webb Simpson | 2nd | 1st |
| Hideki Matsuyama | 3rd | 16th |
| Jon Rahm | 4th | 9th |
| Xander Schauffele | 5th | 16th |
| Rickie Fowler | 6th | 37th |
| Sungjae Im | 7th | 34th |
| Gary Woodland | 8th | 40th |
| Bryson DeChambeau | 9th | 52nd |
| Matt Kuchar | 10th | 16th |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Hudson Swafford | 63rd | 9th(−54) |
| Brandon Hagy | 66th | 16th(−50) |
| Max Homa | 54th | 6th(−48) |
| Mark Hubbard | 53rd | 9th(−44) |
| Bryson DeChambeau | 9th | 52nd(+43) |
| J.B. Holmes | 59th | 16th(−43) |
| Patrick Rodgers | 58th | 16th(−42) |
| Denny McCarthy | 20th | 59th(+39) |
| Keith Mitchell | 55th | 16th(−39) |
| Dylan Frittelli | 25th | 63rd(+38) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at TPC Scottsdale (Stadium Course) in Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the Waste Management Phoenix Open in 2019-2020?
Where was the 2019-2020 Waste Management Phoenix Open played?
What was the winning score at the 2019-2020 Waste Management Phoenix Open?
How many players were in the Waste Management Phoenix Open field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.