Tournaments / 2021-2022
Genesis Scottish Open
2022-07-07 · The Renaissance Club
- Winner
- Xander Schauffele
- Winning score
- -7
- Field
- 152
- Field strength
- +0.49 SG
The 2021-2022 Genesis Scottish Open was played at The Renaissance Club, starting 7 July 2022. Xander Schauffele won at 7 under par (273), 1 stroke ahead of Kurt Kitayama. The winning card was 72, 65, 66 and 70, and the win paid $1,400,000. Kurt Kitayama finished second, and Tom Kim was third. 152 players started the event. The field averaged +0.49 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 53% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 152. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- Xander Schauffele
- Pos
- 1
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 65
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 273
- Kurt Kitayama
- Pos
- 2
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 274
- Tom Kim
- Pos
- 3
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 275
- Patrick Cantlay
- Pos
- T4
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 276
- Tommy Fleetwood
- Pos
- T4
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 276
- Brandon Wu
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 277
- Cameron Tringale
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 61
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 74
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 277
- Jamie Donaldson
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 277
- Matt Fitzpatrick
- Pos
- T6
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 277
- Alex Smalley
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 73
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 278
- Cameron Smith
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 75
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 278
- Dean Burmester
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 278
- Jordan Spieth
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 278
- Rasmus Højgaard
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 278
- Thomas Detry
- Pos
- T10
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 278
- Christiaan Bezuidenhout
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 279
- Doug Ghim
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 74
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 279
- Jason Scrivener
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 73
- R3
- 72
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 279
- Joaquin Niemann
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 279
- Maverick McNealy
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 279
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 72 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.196
- Top-20 hit rate
- 55%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 25.3
Grade is this event’s percentile (15th) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Jon Rahm | 1st | 55th |
| Xander Schauffele | 2nd | 1st |
| Patrick Cantlay | 3rd | 4th |
| Cameron Smith | 4th | 10th |
| Corey Conners | 5th | 61st |
| Sam Burns | 6th | 66th |
| Matt Fitzpatrick | 7th | 6th |
| Joaquin Niemann | 8th | 16th |
| Max Homa | 9th | 16th |
| Chris Kirk | 10th | 71st |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Kurt Kitayama | 65th | 2nd(−63) |
| Brandon Wu | 68th | 6th(−62) |
| Chris Kirk | 10th | 71st(+61) |
| Sam Burns | 6th | 66th(+60) |
| Dean Burmester | 69th | 10th(−59) |
| Corey Conners | 5th | 61st(+56) |
| Jon Rahm | 1st | 55th(+54) |
| Justin Rose | 15th | 69th(+54) |
| Rasmus Højgaard | 60th | 10th(−50) |
| Sami Valimaki | 71st | 24th(−47) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at The Renaissance Club in North Berwick, SCO. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the Genesis Scottish Open in 2021-2022?
Where was the 2021-2022 Genesis Scottish Open played?
What was the winning score at the 2021-2022 Genesis Scottish Open?
How many players were in the Genesis Scottish Open field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.