Tournaments / 2013-2014
CIMB Classic
2013-10-24 · TPC Kuala Lumpur
- Winner
- Ryan Moore
- Winning score
- -14
- Field
- 74
- Field strength
- +0.294 SG
The 2013-2014 CIMB Classic was played at TPC Kuala Lumpur, starting 24 October 2013. Ryan Moore won at 14 under par (274). The winning card was 63, 72, 69 and 70, and the win paid $1,260,000. Gary Woodland finished second, and Chris Stroud and Kiradech Aphibarnrat tied for third. 74 players started the event. The field averaged +0.294 strokes gained per round against the tour baseline, with strokes-gained data covering 88% of the players. The full leaderboard below lists every player's finish position, round scores and total to par. Every figure on this page comes from the published final leaderboard for the event — nothing here is estimated or modelled.
Final leaderboard
Top 20 of 74. Search finds any player in the field, including those who missed the cut.
- Ryan Moore
- Pos
- P1
- R1
- 63
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 274
- Gary Woodland
- Pos
- P2
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 274
- Chris Stroud
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 275
- Kiradech Aphibarnrat
- Pos
- T3
- R1
- 67
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 275
- Aaron Baddeley
- Pos
- 5
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 66
- Total
- 276
- Jimmy Walker
- Pos
- 6
- R1
- 74
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 277
- Charles Howell III
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 72
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 68
- Total
- 278
- Graham DeLaet
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 68
- R4
- 71
- Total
- 278
- Harris English
- Pos
- T7
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 69
- Total
- 278
- Keegan Bradley
- Pos
- 10
- R1
- 65
- R2
- 66
- R3
- 76
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 279
- Billy Horschel
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 72
- R4
- 67
- Total
- 280
- Sergio Garcia
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 66
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 280
- Stewart Cink
- Pos
- T11
- R1
- 70
- R2
- 68
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 73
- Total
- 280
- Bryce Molder
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 67
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 281
- K.J. Choi
- Pos
- T14
- R1
- 68
- R2
- 71
- R3
- 70
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 281
- Bill Haas
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 282
- Jeff Overton
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 73
- R2
- 67
- R3
- 72
- R4
- 70
- Total
- 282
- Shiv Kapur
- Pos
- T16
- R1
- 69
- R2
- 70
- R3
- 71
- R4
- 72
- Total
- 282
- Bo Van Pelt
- Pos
- T19
- R1
- 72
- R2
- 77
- R3
- 69
- R4
- 65
- Total
- 283
- Jerry Kelly
- Pos
- T19
- R1
- 71
- R2
- 69
- R3
- 66
- R4
- 77
- Total
- 283
Model score
Backtest · reconstructedOur course-fit model re-run as it would have seen this week — using only data that existed before the first tee shot — then compared with how the 74 players actually finished. It was not published in advance, so this measures the model, not a call we made.
- Rank correlation
- +0.318
- Top-20 hit rate
- 55%
- Top-10 avg model rank
- 30.0
Grade is this event’s percentile (48th) against every other event we have scored — not an absolute pass mark. Rank correlation runs −1 to +1, where 0 is a coin flip and a full-field golf model landing near +0.35 is a genuine read.
Who the model liked
Its top 10, and where they finished.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Sergio Garcia | 1st | 11th |
| Keegan Bradley | 2nd | 10th |
| Phil Mickelson | 3rd | 19th |
| Rickie Fowler | 4th | 19th |
| Bubba Watson | 5th | 31st |
| Bill Haas | 6th | 16th |
| Brendon de Jonge | 7th | 53rd |
| Ryan Moore | 8th | 1st |
| Hideki Matsuyama | 9th | 25th |
| Bo Van Pelt | 10th | 19th |
Where it was most wrong
Largest gaps between rank and result, either direction.
| Player | Model | Finish |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Baddeley | 71st | 5th(−66) |
| Kiradech Aphibarnrat | 64th | 3rd(−61) |
| Shiv Kapur | 72nd | 16th(−56) |
| Gary Woodland | 52nd | 2nd(−50) |
| Brian Davis | 26th | 75th(+49) |
| Brendon de Jonge | 7th | 53rd(+46) |
| Kyle Stanley | 63rd | 19th(−44) |
| Brendan Steele | 67th | 25th(−42) |
| Stewart Cink | 48th | 11th(−37) |
| Ernie Els | 11th | 47th(+36) |
One known caveat. Player stats, form and course history are all restricted to what existed before this event. The course archetype is not — it is derived from the venue’s full history, including this edition. That flatters the model slightly and equally at every venue. How the model works.
This event in the model
OTIS ranks every field on how well each player's game matches the course, then prices their chances. Both are published in full and graded afterwards.
This week's modelProbabilities and the track recordHow the model works
The venue
This event was played at TPC Kuala Lumpur in Kuala Lumpur, MAS. The venue page carries its scorecard, hosting history and every other tour event played there.
Common questions
Who won the CIMB Classic in 2013-2014?
Where was the 2013-2014 CIMB Classic played?
What was the winning score at the 2013-2014 CIMB Classic?
How many players were in the CIMB Classic field?
Where these numbers come from
Finishes, round scores and to-par figures are the published final leaderboard for this event. Nothing is estimated or interpolated — where no value was published, this page shows a gap rather than a guess. Full sourcing notes are on the methodology page, and every stat name is defined in the glossary.