Hottest form right now

Which PGA Tour players are playing best right now: recent scoring measured against each player's own 12-month baseline.

#	Player	Δ vs baseline
1	Neal Shipley	+2.16
2	Billy Horschel	+2.13
3	Sungjae Im	+2.08
4	Chris Kirk	+2.04
5	Kevin Roy	+1.97
6	Michael Brennan	+1.96
7	Marco Penge	+1.87
8	Emiliano Grillo	+1.86
9	Joe Highsmith	+1.84
10	Austin Smotherman	+1.83
11	Jacob Bridgeman	+1.80
12	Kevin Streelman	+1.79
13	Chandler Blanchet	+1.79
14	Gordon Sargent	+1.78
15	Adam Schenk	+1.77
16	John VanDerLaan	+1.72
17	Doug Ghim	+1.70
18	Luke Clanton	+1.70
19	Johnny Keefer	+1.62
20	Zach Bauchou	+1.56
21	Rico Hoey	+1.56
22	Kevin Yu	+1.55
23	Michael Kim	+1.52
24	Davis Riley	+1.50
25	Seamus Power	+1.47
26	Xander Schauffele	+1.46
27	Harry Hall	+1.46
28	Hank Lebioda	+1.45
29	Patrick Fishburn	+1.42
30	Brian Harman	+1.41
31	Corey Conners	+1.41
32	Danny Walker	+1.38
33	Andrew Novak	+1.31
34	Justin Lower	+1.28
35	Stephan Jaeger	+1.27
36	Takumi Kanaya	+1.27
37	Brian Campbell	+1.24
38	Matt Wallace	+1.24
39	John Parry	+1.21
40	Ben James	+1.21
41	Adam Scott	+1.20
42	J.T. Poston	+1.20
43	Sam Burns	+1.19
44	Zecheng Dou	+1.17
45	Jordan Smith	+1.14
46	Jordan Spieth	+1.10
47	Mark Hubbard	+1.10
48	Davis Chatfield	+1.10
49	Patrick Cantlay	+1.09
50	Max Greyserman	+1.09

Each player's last-5-events scoring average versus their own trailing 12-month baseline; negative-to-positive delta means improving. Eligibility: at least 5 stroke-play events in the trailing year. Sourcing is described in the methodology; stat definitions live in the glossary.

What this leaderboard ranks

Which PGA Tour players are playing best right now: recent scoring measured against each player's own 12-month baseline. The table lists 50 players, ordered by δ vs baseline, with every name linking to that player's full profile — fifteen seasons of strokes gained, results and rankings. Each player's last-5-events scoring average versus their own trailing 12-month baseline; negative-to-positive delta means improving. Eligibility: at least 5 stroke-play events in the trailing year. Nothing here is a projection or an estimate: each value is either a published figure or a straightforward average of published round scores, and where a player has no qualifying data they are absent from the board rather than ranked on a blank.

How ties and positions work

The number in the first column is a list position, not a competition rank. Players holding the same value sit next to each other but the numbering continues straight down the list, so two players who are genuinely level may show as different positions. When figures are close, read the value column rather than the ordinal. This is a deliberate simplification: inventing a tie-break the tour does not publish would lay a fabricated ordering over real numbers, and on a board like career wins — where many players share a total — that ordering would look authoritative while meaning nothing.

Coverage and eligibility

Career records such as wins, majors and world ranking come from published records and include achievements from before the fifteen-season statistics window, so a long career is represented in full. Boards computed from round scores — current form and the green-type scoring averages — require a minimum sample before a player qualifies, because an average built from a handful of rounds is noise wearing the costume of a statistic. Players below that threshold are omitted rather than shown with a caveat, which keeps the ordering meaningful all the way down.

Common questions

What does the hottest form right now leaderboard measure?

Which PGA Tour players are playing best right now: recent scoring measured against each player's own 12-month baseline. Each player's last-5-events scoring average versus their own trailing 12-month baseline; negative-to-positive delta means improving. Eligibility: at least 5 stroke-play events in the trailing year.

How are ties handled on this leaderboard?

Players with identical values appear adjacent, but position numbers run straight down the list rather than being shared. Read the value column rather than the position when figures are close — OTIS does not invent a tie-break the tour does not publish.

Why are some players missing from this leaderboard?

Boards computed from round scores require a minimum sample before a player qualifies. Below that threshold there are not enough rounds for the average to mean anything, so the player is left out rather than ranked on a figure that cannot support the position.

Where does this leaderboard's data come from?

From published records and round scores. Nothing is estimated — a player without a qualifying figure is absent rather than assigned one.

Sourcing is set out on the methodology page; every stat name is defined in the glossary.